The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that the Defense Department could begin implementing a ban on trans-identifying service members, prompting The Hill to publish a response that read more like a partisan temper tantrum than an unbiased report.
In the opening paragraph, the authors complained that the Supreme Court — which is, by definition, the nation’s highest court and the final say in all legal matters — was somehow “undermining” the [obviously correct] decisions that had been issued previously by lower courts. The paragraph went on to assert that President Donald Trump’s administration had “broadly sought to restrict transgender rights.”
The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed President Trump’s administration to begin enforcing a ban on transgender troops serving openly in the military, undermining two lower court decisions and handing a victory to an administration…
