British taxpayers don’t want to pay for security for Prince Harry in the U.K. when he returns to his homeland for visits from the United States. Today a High Court judge upheld a decision that they don’t have to do that.
Harry, the Duke of Sussex, argued that he should have automatic protection for himself, Meghan, and his young children whenever they returned to the U.K. from their home in California. That royal perk was taken from Harry in February 2020 when he and Meghan decided to stop carrying out official royal duties.
Today High Court Judge Peter Lane upheld the U.K. government decision and that specifically of the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (RAVEC) to downgrade Harry.
“The court has found that there has not been any unlawfulness in reaching the decision of 28 February 2020,” Lane ruled in documents seen by PEOPLE. “The decision…
