One of the liberal tropes about gun ownership is that men buy them to compensate for their, uh, “hand” size (or “foot” size, if you subscribe to that theory…).
And by “hand,” I mean penis.
The argument is that men with small “units” overcompensate by buying guns in order to feel powerful, given that we feel our masculinity is in question. Obviously, liberals make this claim at least partly to insult or shame us, but I suspect that there is also some sociological theory behind the claim.
Call it a variation on the Napoleon complex.
Well, a sociologist has tested out this theory and has found that the opposite is the case; the more satisfied a man is with his length and girth the more likely he is to own a gun.
Do men with big guns have small penises? Science finally reveals what they’re really packin’ https://t.co/LE3cbbnzBa pic.twitter.com/iRLPu1urEJ
— New York Post…
