Answer: Nope. Apparently, Kamala Harris has no familiarity with the concept of “paying for” cash giveaways.
In that, she’s hardly alone in Washington. However, most politicians will try to craft some sort of balancing ‘revenue enhancement’ to cash subsidies as at least some political cover for questions such as these, not to mention the issue of blowing up deficit spending and accelerating inflation. Harris didn’t even bother with that fig leaf yesterday, insisting that her cash-stimulus plans would get paid for with vibes, or something:
Kamala just took an ultra rare question from the press on how she plans on paying for her economic plan
She used the phrase “return on investment” 4 times in one minute and says she’ll reduce “child povracy” by 50%
She’s either nervous, drunk, or both
Not ready for prime time pic.twitter.com/wQ1DrwHvrQ
— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) August…
