We’ve sure seen a lot of news about leftist activist judges lately, but lest we forget, there are some good judges out there, even on the notoriously oft-overturned Ninth Circuit. It is on that court that we find Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke who, in his dissent from the 9th Circuit’s decision in the Duncan v Bonta case, blistered the judges and other activists who show no demonstrated knowledge of firearms or how they work.
Judge Lawrence VanDyke posted his dissent of the 9th Circuit Courts ruling in Duncan v Bonta stating that his colleagues “lack a basic familiarity with firearms to understand the inherent shortcomings and obvious inadmissibility of the test that California was proposing.” pic.twitter.com/e9genNMCyz
— Silent Majority Foundation (@smfjb_org) March 24, 2025
Judge VanDyke said:
California’s argument which a majority has unwisely…
