As RedState reported, the “interview” MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle did with Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris on Wednesday was so bad that even the left-wing echo chamber at the New York Times couldn’t help but take a sledgehammer to it.
They correctly pointed out, for instance, that it was done primarily so Harris’ handlers could say she’d done another cable news interview. Further, they noted that Harris’ “media strategy has been to sit with friendly inquisitors who are not inclined to ask terribly thorny questions or press her when her responses are evasive.”
“A hard-hitting Harris interview is still yet to come,” they also observed.
READ MORE–>> Unraveling: The Dam Breaks As the NY Times Notices Some Things About Kamala Harris’ MSNBC ‘Interview’
Whether or not the Times was merely feeling a bit chippy because Harris has yet to sit down for an interview with print…