New York Times columnist Masha Gessen joined NPR host Michel Martin on Wednesday’s edition of Amanpour and Company on PBS, where he attacked the Supreme Court for not listening to the left’s preferred “experts” on the case involving Tennessee’s ban on so-called “gender-affirming care” for minors.
Martin declared, “You have some interesting things to say in a number of the columns that you’ve written about how this is also about a kind of loathing or resistance to expertise,” before inviting Gessen to “Say more about that, why you say that.”
Gessen lamented, “I think that’s what we really saw in the Supreme Court hearing, right? It was supposed to be an Equal Protection Clause hearing. So, it was all supposed to be about whether it constitutes sex discrimination. But in fact, the justices kept going back, and this is true for…
