One has to wonder just how long Harvard will stand on its principles in this fight — especially when the main principle appears to be the right to discriminate on the basis of race, sex, and religion. And given how the Harvard Law Review operates, that’s not an exaggeration.
On Friday, the Washington Free Beacon ran an exposé on the Review, based on internal documents they obtained. The journal — ostensibly independent but run out of Harvard Law School — made discrimination a key process in topics, writers, and editors:
Will this law review article “promote DEI values”? Does it cite scholars from “underrepresented groups”? Will it have “any foreseeable impact in enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion”? And why did one team of editors solicit “only white, male authors”?
Those are some of the questions that editors at the Harvard Law Review asked in…
