On Thursday, the Democrat members of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government appeared to hash out the question, “What Is a Whistleblower?” When, in 2019, Lt. Colonel Alexander Vindman proudly postured in front of Congress to blow the whistle on former President Donald J. Trump about the Ukraine phone call, Democrats had no problem drinking in his every word, and insisting that his status as a “whistleblower” was valid and his testimony worthy to be heard. Now that particular FBI whistleblowers are calling out the government’s highest law enforcement agency for its overreach and retaliation against them and the American people, the term needs to be redefined, and their credibility questioned.Read More
Witness Tristan Leavitt Schools House Weaponization Committee Dems on What Constitutes an FBI Whistleblower
